I'd like to think we aren't at a stage where a site could "destroy" our career since most people I know don't read criticism anymore and just listen to their freinds. Pitchfork has been so supportive to us through the years as have fans and other sites, we feel super lucky. Boundaries are good! As for sites and all that stuff. As for the interview, the author was super kind and nice I just have boundaries and I wont dig deep into certain topics.
I give albums 5 spins to properly sit with them. I mean I wish more people listened to albums from front to back more often and paused before declaring it THE BEST EVER or THIS IS SHIT. I'm excited about how music is consumed now in many ways.
TOKEK GECKO FULL
Life is full of context and your songs carry the quality of our convoluted nature of emotion. Thank you for making the lush and complex music of fragmentation and harmony that you do. The first time I listened to Three Rings, I had tears in my eyes. The first time I listened to Will Calls, (Marfa Demo) I had tears in my eyes. Obligatory: The first time I listened to Two Weeks, I had tears in my eyes. So, with the nature of what there platform is and who they are and what they represent, is there a layer sensitivity or contempt for the exploitation by these commodities such as Pitchfork and their like now? They are these gatekeepers that kind of push a bit of contempt for not being in the 'know.' But, at the same time they can ruin a band with a bad review or a snarky comment.
I say this as someone who has read them for quite some time now, and do think there is a place for them. And Pitchfork is one of the cultural titans of indie music who have kicked a lot of what goes on now into gear. But, I find there to be subtext here, as it is a Pitchfork interview. It seems a bit awkward, but it could be the nature of the format being print. And then there is a moment where the interviewer seemingly crosses the line with a probing question in an attempt to get Ed to open up about what has been going on in his life recently. In the Pitchfork article released yesterday, Ed and Chris discuss music streaming and how everything has shifted in recent years. I have a question about the landscape of music molding with social media and the internet in general, parallel to Grizzly Bear releasing music.
TOKEK GECKO MOD
Articles discussing events in musician's lives are subject to mod discretion.Ĭome share some music in the official /r/music plug.dj! No links to unauthorized music leaks or promotion of piracyĭiscussions and Articles should be directly relevant to music, music technology, or the music business itselfĪrticles / Tweets discussing statements by musicians not relevant to their work are not allowed. For help with identifying a song, use /r/tipofmytongue or /r/namethatsong.Įxceptions are made for exclusive releases or tracks not available on an artist's official channel. No /r/ifyoulikeblank, /r/tipofmytongue, or request-style postsįor recommendations of new artists similar to those you already like, use /r/ifyoulikeblank. You can select your flair beneath your link after posting. Submitters: For original music, use the " I Made This" flair. Well known tracks will be removed at mod discretion. Saturdays are for fresh and original musicĭedicated to underground artists, your original compositions, and new releases by known artists.
Bad discussion posts are subject to removal on any day. If your post is "low effort" or looks like just another way of posting streaming music, then it will be removed. If you have an interesting story behind the music, you can add this in the comments or as self-post text.įriday is for interesting discussions, not streaming music. No artist reposts for 30 days if the previous post broke 100 points Optional additional text may only be included after this part of the title.
0 kommentar(er)
